Who Has Decision-Making Authority in the Church

Many LDS, don’t agree with all of the doctrine or policies of the church, and they have to decide if they will publicly protest against those differences. This essay gives my view of the issue. The essay does not discuss interpretation of doctrine or policies.

The Church

Latter-day Saints have chosen to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. With a few exceptions, of course, these people  are not in decision-making positions. Their choice of membership, either to become members or to remain members, implies acceptance of the decisions made by the senior hierarchy of the church. Their membership does not imply agreement with all aspects of doctrine or policies. I believe that members who disagree with doctrine or policies have only two decisions: to remain members of the church, recognizing that they disagree with some aspects of the church, or to leave the church. I do not believe that members should publicly protest against the church, with the hope that the church authorities might change the doctrine or policies.

The Family

Latter-day Saints are, of course, head of their families, and they have the right to make decisions about their families. Their decisions may or may not agree with all aspects of church doctrine or policies. If persons disagree with church doctrine or policies, these persons have the right, as head of their families, to speak out publicly to protest the doctrine and policies. However, in order to avoid hypocrisy, these persons should, in my opinion, leave the church before public protests are made.


Individuals do have the right to publicly protest doctrine and policies of the church and of their families. Again, such persons should leave the church or their families before public protests are made. Of course, there are legal constraints on young people leaving their parents to establish their own families, and these restrictions must be complied with to avoid the penalties of breaking the law.


Membership in the church implies acceptance of the positions taken by that organization. Persons disagreeing with such positions should either remain members of the church and remain quiet (publicly) about their differences or should leave the organization before disagreeing publicly with the organization. People do, of course, have the right to privately discuss their differences with persons in decision-making positions.


About Allen

I am a person who, without argument or debate, wants to discuss and share ideas with others. Even though we may disagree on things, civil discourse will help us retain sanity and friendship in our relationships.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s